(NEW YORK) — A choose gave the inexperienced gentle Wednesday to a lawsuit by an American woman who claims Britain’s Prince Andrew sexually abused her when she was 17.
U.S. District Choose Lewis A. Kaplan wrote in an opinion that Andrew’s legal professionals unsuccessful to productively challenge the constitutionality of Virginia Giuffre’s lawsuit. Giuffre sued the prince in August, alleging that she was coerced into sexual encounters with Andrew in 2001 by Epstein and his longtime companion, Ghislaine Maxwell.
His legal professionals experienced reported that the lawsuit lacked specificity and was disqualified by a deal she achieved in 2009 with lawyers for Jeffrey Epstein. They also attacked the trustworthiness and motives of Giuffre, indicating in Oct that the lawsuit was aimed at accomplishing “an additional payday at his cost and at the cost of those closest to him.”
Read Far more: What To Know About the Contacts E-book That Could Be Vital to Ghislaine Maxwell’s Trial
The prince’s attorneys have reported that Andrew hardly ever sexually abused or assaulted Giuffre and that he “unequivocally denies Giuffre’s untrue allegations against him.” The prince himself has strenuously denied Giuffre’s allegations. In late 2019, Prince Andrew instructed BBC Newsnight that sexual intercourse with Giuffre “didn’t come about” and he has “no recollection” of at any time conference her.
The job interview was extensively panned by critics who said Andrew seemed insensitive to Epstein’s victims. Afterward, the prince stepped back again from royal responsibilities.
On Wednesday, his legal professionals did not quickly reply to messages seeking remark. Buckingham Palace informed The Affiliated Push that it would not remark on the “ongoing lawful subject.”
Kaplan pointed out that he was expected by legislation, at this phase of the litigation, to move forward as if the allegations created by Giuffre are legitimate.
“The legislation prohibits the Courtroom from thinking of at this stage of the proceedings defendant’s efforts to forged doubt on the reality of Ms. Giuffre’s allegations, even however his attempts would be permissible at demo,” Kaplan said.
Read More: From Ghislaine Maxwell to Kim Potter, It’s the Chance Each individual Defendant Weighs
Giuffre’s settlement with Epstein was reached a 10 years in advance of the financier killed himself at a Manhattan lockup as he awaited a sexual intercourse trafficking trial in 2019. But Kaplan wrote that there had been sizeable indications in the $500,000 settlement that Epstein and Giuffre did not plainly intend for language to “directly,” “primarily,” or “substantially” reward somebody this sort of as the prince. He pointed out that the prince was not a occasion to the arrangement.
He also mentioned the arrangement was “far from a design of crystal clear and specific drafting.”
The judge’s results mirrored reviews he produced for the duration of oral arguments by both equally sides when he was notably dismissive of the arguments made on the prince’s behalf.
Epstein, 66, killed himself in a Manhattan jail cell in 2019 even though awaiting a sex trafficking demo, whilst Maxwell, 60, was not long ago convicted of sex trafficking and conspiracy expenses in federal courtroom in New York. Giuffre’s allegations against Andrew had been not a portion of both legal case.
The Linked Press does not commonly determine individuals who say they are victims of sexual assault until they pick out to arrive forward publicly, as Giuffre has.
AP reporter Danica Kirka contributed from London.