Elon Musk says California proposal to cut solar incentives is a ‘bizarre anti-environment move’

Late Tuesday night, Tesla CEO Elon Musk weighed in on a controversial subject matter in California: the state’s photo voltaic tax proposal. Musk tweeted that California’s proposal was a “bizarre anti-setting go by govt of California.”

UnderstandSolar is a free support that links you to leading-rated photo voltaic installers in your location for personalized photo voltaic estimates. Tesla now features rate matching, so it is critical to shop for the greatest quotes. Click below to study far more and get your offers. — *advertisement.

California solar proposal backlash

On Monday, Tesla, which sells solar roofs and solar panels, launched a net webpage to permit folks to complain to Governor Gavin Newsom (D-CA) and the California Public Utilities Fee (CPUC) about the proposal:

Notify Governor Newsom and the CPUC to reject the proposed solar tax and retroactive variations to existing photo voltaic consumers.

Really encourage the Public Utilities Fee to reject a proposed punitive tax on solar consumers and retroactive modifications to current buyers. 

The CPUC’s controversial NEM 3. proposal, which is expected to be voted on later on this thirty day period, imposes costs on photo voltaic and battery storage clients, which would make solar and storage far more expensive. NEM 3. would reduce the bill credit rating solar shoppers get for promoting electrical power back to the grid. As Electrek described on January 3:

The credit score for vitality that household photo voltaic proprietors set again into the grid would be slashed to a wholesale charge of about $.04 per kWh.

On major of slashing web metering premiums, the NEM 3. proposal provides a new mounted regular cost for solar proprietors of $8 per kW mounted on their roof.

It usually means that somebody with a 10 kW program has to spend $80 for each thirty day period to their electric utility just to continue to be related to the grid and send out back energy at a new lower fee.

At a press conference on Monday, Newsom expressed issue about the proposal, which is backed by Pacific Gas & Electrical, Southern California Edison, and San Diego Gas & Electrical. All are trader-owned electrical utilities. Bloomberg noted yesterday about that press meeting:

“I’ll say this about the program, we continue to have some work to do,” Newsom stated. He later additional that he thinks changes will will need to be built to the proposal that is envisioned to be voted on afterwards this thirty day period by condition utility regulators. He didn’t say what people modifications would be.

In a statement unveiled yesterday, the Environmental Operating Group‘s president and California resident Ken Prepare dinner weighed in on Newsom’s assertion:

We welcome the governor’s opinions and respectfully urge him to use his voice and entire authority to end the unwell-conceived approach. It is plainly intended to maximize profits for the utilities and crush the only level of competition they now experience – the competitiveness from Californians who are investing to put in solar panels and, increasingly, battery storage on households, organizations, colleges and in communities.

The Photo voltaic Strength Industries Affiliation (SEIA) stated in an electronic mail on December 13 that “this decision will deter quite a few Californians from installing rooftop photo voltaic and storage and sluggish clear electrical power deployment, leaving the state’s grid vulnerable to blackouts and power outages, and harming California’s skill to arrive at its clear electrical power aims.”

NEWS:   CES2022: Vinfast SUV Pricing Announced With Leased Battery Packs

Abigail Ross Hopper, president and CEO of the SEIA, mentioned then in a penned statement:

Only the wealthiest Californians will be ready to pay for rooftop photo voltaic, shutting out educational institutions, small companies, and the regular spouse and children from our clean up electrical power potential.

The only winners now are the utilities, which will make additional profits at the cost of their ratepayers. We urge Governor Newsom to act speedily to adjust this decision — at possibility are 65,000 photo voltaic careers, the security of our electrical power grid, and the health of California residents and our world.

Electrek’s Just take

We at Electrek advocate for clean up energy, so of class we assume NEM 3. is a horrible idea. The Condition of California wants to place its citizens and the ecosystem to start with if we are going to continue the race to combat local weather adjust.

Musk weighing in is only going to aid combat this misguided proposal. Newsom demands to do the appropriate factor and destroy it.

FTC: We use earnings earning vehicle affiliate back links. A lot more.

Subscribe to Electrek on YouTube for unique video clips and subscribe to the podcast. out?v=BxDUz_VoFVo

Show More

Sarah Jackson

Sarah Jackson is dedicated writer on Finance latest trends topics and have enormous knowledge in Finance & Accounting. Sarah is from Leeds, United Kingdom. Her finance and english skills are of top level and able to deal all kind of topics in same category. She also worked in London Stock Exchange.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker